Improving wound infection management: education and evaluation of an infection management pathway.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical impact and acceptance of an infection management (IM) pathway, designed to improve the consistency of care of wound infection when introduced, and supported by an educational programme. METHOD: An education and evaluation programme (T3 programme) was-conducted in Portugal, Spain and Italy. This consisted of a two-hour educational, virtual seminar, followed by a four-week evaluation of an IM pathway during which survey data were collected on the impact of this pathway on clinician-selected patients. Finally, all participants reconvened for a virtual meeting during which the combined results were disseminated. The pathway provided guidance to clinicians regarding the targeted use of antimicrobial wound dressings according to the presence and absence of signs and symptoms of wound infection. RESULTS: Responses relating to 259 patients treated according to the IM pathway, 139 (53.7%) of whom had received previous antimicrobial treatment, were captured. Signs and symptoms of infection resolved within four weeks of treatment in >90% of patients. All 25 patients who had received prior antimicrobial treatment for ≥3 months experienced a resolution in the signs and symptoms of infection within four weeks. The majority of participating clinicians agreed that the IM pathway improved decision-making (94.9%) and confidence (97.3%), and helped to determine the correct antimicrobial treatment (91.4%) in the context of wound infection. CONCLUSION: The T3 programme was an efficient way to deliver a structured educational programme. The use of the IM pathway resulted in >90% of patients achieving resolution of their signs and symptoms of wound infection.

Single-use negative pressure wound therapy to prevent surgical site complications in high-risk patients undergoing caesarean sections: a real-world study.

Surgical site complications (SSCs), including surgical site infection (SSI), are common following C-sections. Management of the post-operative incision with single-use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) has been shown to reduce the risk of SSC in high-risk individuals. This study explored the outcomes of routine, real-world use of sNPWT in high-risk patients undergoing C-sections. An observational, retrospective in-service evaluation was conducted across eight obstetric centres in the Republic and Northern Ireland. Patients undergoing C-sections were stratified for their risk of developing SSC using commonly known risk factors, including BMI ≥30, smoking, diabetes, and whether the patients had undergone previous C-sections or had a previous history of wound dehiscence. Those at high-risk were treated with sNPWT post-operatively. Data relating to any SSC that developed post-operatively, for up to 30 days, were captured. Data were compared with original research previously published by Wloch et al. (2012). Of 1111 women considered high-risk, 106 (9.5%) went on to develop SSCs, predominantly superficial SSIs. SSCs were associated with extra visits with their general practitioner (GP), outpatient visits, or inpatient hospital stays in 5.7%, 2.4%, and 1.7% of the entire cohort, representing 59.4%, 25.5%, and 17.9% of the 106 patients with SSC. Patients needed on average 1.8 extra GP visits and 0.7 extra outpatient visits. Patients who needed to be readmitted to hospital had an average length of stay of 4 days. In comparison with a previously published cohort, in which sNPWT was not used, we observed a significant reduction in the incidence of SSCs across BMI groups 18.5-24.9 (P = 0.02), 25-29.9 (P = 0.003), and ≥35 kg/m2 (P = 0.04). In those patients who had undergone at least one previous C-section, the rates of complications also reduced (P = 0.006). This analysis provides further justification for using sNPWT to manage surgical incisions in patients considered at high risk of developing post-procedural SSCs, particularly those with a BMI ≥30 or a history of more than one C-section.

Evaluation of a five-layer hydrocellular polyurethane foam dressing across wound care settings in southern Europe.

OBJECTIVE: The burden of chronic wounds did not disappear during the Covid-19 pandemic, so new ways to address healthcare practitioner (HCP) education had to evolve. The Teach, Try, and Talk (T3) programme was conceived in 2021 with HCPs in southern Europe (Italy, Spain and Portugal). METHOD: Virtual education sessions with experienced HCP guest speakers were held and a five-layer hydrocellular polyurethane foam dressing (HPFD) was introduced as a way of reducing dressing change frequencies and improving clinician satisfaction. HCPs recorded their experience of the HPFD using an online form and participated in a further virtual session with experienced HCPs to discuss the results. RESULTS: There were a total of 190 responses. A significant dressing change reduction from 3.6 changes per week to 1.8 with the HPFD (p<0.001) was observed in Italy, Spain and Portugal and within different care settings (hospital, wound clinic/health centre and the patient's home). Nearly one-third of participants stated one more day of dressing wear time was achieved by the ability of the HPFD to lock in and manage exudate, with nearly a quarter of responses stating it was due to fewer than three dressing lobes being full. The majority (97.8%) of HCPs stated they would recommend the HPFD to colleagues and patients. CONCLUSION: The T3 programme is a highly successful method of training delivery and practice improvement across a variety of healthcare settings in southern Europe, helping support HCP engagement and ongoing development in challenging times during the Covid-19 pandemic. The programme can be adapted considering the needs of different HCPs and payor and/or healthcare systems.

Diagnosis and treatment of infected wounds: A multi-centre audit of current clinical practice across the UK, Ireland and Scandinavia.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Surveillance of wound infection including signs of infection alongside antimicrobial usage (types, duration, frequency) can highlight knowledge gaps and inconsistencies. This manuscript aims to highlight these, identify and inform opportunities for practice improvement and to show impact of infection management practice may be having on the issue of antimicrobial resistance. BACKGROUND: Infected wounds pose challenges to healthcare professionals. Balancing risk of wound deterioration and progression to systemic infection with appropriate use of antimicrobials is necessary to minimise development of resistance. METHODS: Analysis consisted of a practice survey of 9661 wounds across 70 community sites over a period of one week. Data were collected from projects between 2017 and 2020. The form was available to providers within the UK, Ireland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland. EQUATOR research guidelines were followed; STROBE checklist for observational research reporting was completed. RESULTS: Infection rates of 8.9% were reported from wounds assessed. These data indicate inconsistencies with diagnosis across practice with non-specialists more likely to be unsure of wound infection. Greater confidence in infection identification was observed as number of signs increased. Inconsistencies were also observed in appropriate treatment; antimicrobials were used in 35% of wounds considered not infected and not used in 41% of wounds that were identified as infected. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation of infection management practice of over 9000 wounds provides an insight into diagnosis and treatment of infection. Inconsistencies in diagnosis and treatment of wound infections reported highlight the need for increased education, awareness of diagnosis and treatment of infection. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Variability in management of infected wounds highlights opportunities to aid more effective diagnosis and treatment of infected wounds. Incorporation of support tools or evidence-based pathways into practice may enhance confidence in management of local infection, balanced with appropriate use, potentially minimising resistance and improving outcomes.

Diagnosis and treatment impacts on wound care efficiency drivers: real-world analysis.

Objective: The prevalence and economic burden of wounds are growing. Any wound has the potential to become hard-to-heal and require frequent care. Clinicians need to find ways to absorb demand on services without compromising outcomes. Drivers of wound care efficiency-time-to-heal, frequency of dressing change and the incidence of complications-can be evaluated to shape future wound management. A survey of wound care was conducted by clinicians from five centres in Sweden over a one-week period, during which clinicians documented every wound once. At the time of surveying, 49% of wounds were considered to be improving, infection incidence was 11.7% and dressings were changed a mean of 2.2 times per week, with highly exuding wounds changed 6.9 times per week. The data highlighted the importance of diagnosing patient and wound characteristics in selecting treatments and organising care. Recognised gaps in diagnoses potentially identify opportunities to influence healing, complication incidence and intensity of nursing, thus reducing demand on resources. In conclusion, this survey highlights opportunities to reduce the burdens these drivers present. Through improved diagnosis and alignment to recognised care pathways, there is potential to improve patient outcomes and alleviate the strains placed upon wound care providers.

Impact of a wound management system on budget optimisation, formulary compliance and variations in care.

Optimising budgets in wound care is crucial if local health economy efficiencies are to be realised. How spending is managed and monitored can be difficult for community nursing services due to the variety of supply routes. Online wound management systems not on help tailor supply routes to reduce waste, thereby reducing cost, but also provide an audit platform for transparency across clinical practice. The non-prescription ordering system Formeo was implemented across City Health Care Partnership (CHCP), Hull, through a value-based industry collaboration. With its use, monthly spend on wound care reduced by approximately £5354 (11.9%), with a reduction in the total spend of £64 254. Further, Formeo enabled an audit of clinical practice to minimise products on the formulary. This provided CHCP, Hull, the opportunity to reduce variations in care, and therefore potentially improve clinical outcomes.

Clinical and Economic Impact of Wound Care Using a Polyurethane Foam Multilayer Dressing.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of a newly introduced dressing on efficiency and quality of care in routine clinical practice in a Spanish community setting. DESIGN AND SETTING: An ambispective multicenter observational study was conducted in 24 primary care centers and 6 nursing homes in 4 different Spanish regions. The study was carried out between November 2017 and March 2019. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: A total of 128 wounds in 94 patients (primary care, n = 79; nursing home, n = 15) were analyzed before and 4 weeks after switching to the study dressing. OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of dressing changes; secondary outcomes were change in the mean wound area and weekly cost and patient and provider satisfaction. MAIN RESULTS: The mean number of dressing changes was significantly reduced with the study dressing from 3.14 ± 1.77 changes per week to 1.66 ± 0.87 (P < .001), a 47.1% reduction in frequency. Wound area significantly reduced from 9.90 ± 19.62 cm to 7.10 ± 24.33 cm. In addition, a 58.7% reduction in weekly costs was achieved with the intervention. Patients and providers agreed that their satisfaction with wound care improved. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the study dressing in routine clinical practice could lead to a major improvement in both efficiency and quality of wound care. Its use could reduce wound care-related costs through improvements in healing and a reduced frequency of dressing changes. It also enhanced the wound care experience from the perspective of both patients and providers.

The characteristics and impact of hard-to-heal wounds: results of a standardised survey.

The effective management of hard-to-heal wounds has increasingly important implications for those who provide wound care services within healthcare systems. The burden of wounds in the population continues to grow, as does the demand for wound care, against a backdrop of cost constraints and increasing expectations. The need to improve both outcomes and efficiency in wound care is therefore paramount and the time taken to heal wounds is an important factor in determining both. Survey methodology was used to collect data across 10 community wound care providers in the UK, Ireland, Finland, Norway and Denmark between February and August 2017. This allowed for analysis of wounds and their characteristics, dressing selection and nursing practice across a typical wound caseload. Data from 1057 wounds demonstrates that the characteristics and consequences of hard-to-heal wounds are different from improving wounds. However, wounds are, in general, treated in the same way, irrespective of whether they are hard-to-heal or improving, suggesting that the healing status of a wound is not a major factor in treatment selection. Early intervention to return hard-to-heal wounds to a healing trajectory may be a useful approach to improving efficiency in wound care.